- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message65228
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, jnferguson |
| Date | 2008-04-09.01:37:21 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.14110592 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <d38f5330804081837k3c040b30i630c75971a7effb2@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <1207704078.65.0.53495309332.issue2588@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Tue, Apr 8, 2008 at 9:21 PM, Justin Ferguson <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: > .. > While no one seems to ever use it this way, don't forget that a good > alternative to asprintf() is calling sprintf() with a length of zero to > get the length (in compliant implementations), allocating the memory and > then calling it again. Remember that PyOS_vsnprintf was introduced back in 2001 when (according to the comments in the file) not all platforms provided c99 compliant implementations. If you can verify that the situation has changes for the supported platforms, I think you will have a good case for making the wrapper c99 compliant. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-04-09 01:37:22 | belopolsky | set | spambayes_score: 0.141106 -> 0.14110592 recipients: + belopolsky, amaury.forgeotdarc, jnferguson |
| 2008-04-09 01:37:22 | belopolsky | link | issue2588 messages |
| 2008-04-09 01:37:21 | belopolsky | create | |

