- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message61442
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | mark.dickinson |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Rhamphoryncus, christian.heimes, gmcastil, mark.dickinson, tim.peters |
| Date | 2008-01-21.19:39:53 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.041157287 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <1200944398.27.0.876465371891.issue1640@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Also, for the C-level routines, atanh(1.0) and atanh(-1.0) should definitely return infinity and -infinity (and probably set errno as well.) Note that this is not an argument about what Python should do: Python will still raise a ValueError for atanh(1.0) and atanh(-1.0). But the atanh is supposed to be a drop-in replacement for the libm atanh, on those platforms where it's missing. And the C99 standard is clear about return values, even though it's not useful when it comes to deciding whether to set errno or not. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-01-21 19:39:58 | mark.dickinson | set | spambayes_score: 0.0411573 -> 0.041157287 recipients: + mark.dickinson, tim.peters, Rhamphoryncus, christian.heimes, gmcastil |
| 2008-01-21 19:39:58 | mark.dickinson | set | spambayes_score: 0.0411573 -> 0.0411573 messageid: <1200944398.27.0.876465371891.issue1640@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2008-01-21 19:39:53 | mark.dickinson | link | issue1640 messages |
| 2008-01-21 19:39:53 | mark.dickinson | create | |

