- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message61414
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | christian.heimes |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Rhamphoryncus, christian.heimes, gmcastil, gvanrossum, mark.dickinson, tim.peters |
| Date | 2008-01-21.16:56:35 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0029383318 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <4794CEB7.2040502@cheimes.de> |
| In-reply-to | <1200928287.73.0.152686192639.issue1640@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Mark Dickinson wrote: > Mark Dickinson added the comment: > > Christian: would it be possible for you to tell me what the argument of the > log1p call is on Windows in that last branch of c_atanh, for the testcase > atanh0022. > > On OS X I get: > > Input to log1p is 3.2451855365842669075e+32 > > It's hard to imagine that there's anything wrong with log1p here, since all > it does for a large input like this is compute log(1+x). You got me wrong (and I didn't explain it properly). All complex functions pass the test. math.atanh() fails. I think my implementation of Python/pymath.c:atanh() doesn't return the right value for arguments almost 1.0. Christian |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2008-01-21 16:56:36 | christian.heimes | set | spambayes_score: 0.00293833 -> 0.0029383318 recipients: + christian.heimes, gvanrossum, tim.peters, mark.dickinson, Rhamphoryncus, gmcastil |
| 2008-01-21 16:56:35 | christian.heimes | link | issue1640 messages |
| 2008-01-21 16:56:35 | christian.heimes | create | |

