- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message410858
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | petr.viktorin |
|---|---|
| Recipients | erlendaasland, petr.viktorin, shihai1991, vstinner |
| Date | 2022-01-18.12:57:29 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1642510649.22.0.930385863652.issue46417@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
If we have static types, that means there is a mechanism to share some objects across interpreters. And if that's the case, why can't small ints (like sys.float_info.n_unnamed_fields) be static & shared as well? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2022-01-18 12:57:29 | petr.viktorin | set | recipients: + petr.viktorin, vstinner, shihai1991, erlendaasland |
| 2022-01-18 12:57:29 | petr.viktorin | set | messageid: <1642510649.22.0.930385863652.issue46417@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2022-01-18 12:57:29 | petr.viktorin | link | issue46417 messages |
| 2022-01-18 12:57:29 | petr.viktorin | create | |

