- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message391362
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | ammar2 |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Guido.van.Rossum, aidan.feldman, ammar2, docs@python, gvanrossum, rhettinger, steven.daprano, terry.reedy, zach.ware |
| Date | 2021-04-19.04:55:30 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1618808130.77.0.319658153456.issue43837@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Opened https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/25469 for the first suggestion of reversing the precedence table order since it seems like a good improvement. I think the tight binding to weak order is more natural and aside from K&R, the following other languages also follow the same ordering: * Javascript - https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/JavaScript/Reference/Operators/Operator_Precedence#table * PHP - https://www.php.net/manual/en/language.operators.precedence.php * Rust - https://doc.rust-lang.org/reference/expressions.html#expression-precedence |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2021-04-19 04:55:30 | ammar2 | set | recipients: + ammar2, gvanrossum, rhettinger, terry.reedy, steven.daprano, docs@python, zach.ware, Guido.van.Rossum, aidan.feldman |
| 2021-04-19 04:55:30 | ammar2 | set | messageid: <1618808130.77.0.319658153456.issue43837@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021-04-19 04:55:30 | ammar2 | link | issue43837 messages |
| 2021-04-19 04:55:30 | ammar2 | create | |

