- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message388861
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | mattip |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Mark.Shannon, eric.snow, gvanrossum, mattip, nascheme, vstinner |
| Date | 2021-03-16.17:12:48 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1615914768.56.0.414309354076.issue43503@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I am confused. How can widening the usable number of functions (i.e. using the whole C-API rather than the limited API) help c-extension modules be usable in subinterpreters? Aren't the same singletons, exception types, and other types exposed in the full C-API? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2021-03-16 17:12:48 | mattip | set | recipients: + mattip, gvanrossum, nascheme, vstinner, Mark.Shannon, eric.snow |
| 2021-03-16 17:12:48 | mattip | set | messageid: <1615914768.56.0.414309354076.issue43503@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2021-03-16 17:12:48 | mattip | link | issue43503 messages |
| 2021-03-16 17:12:48 | mattip | create | |

