Message 386140 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Content 
Sorry, I lost this bug in my TODO list :(

> > I don't think it's necessary here.
> 
> Did you read my rationale (first message)? Do you mean that per-interpreter GIL is not worth it?

Right, I mean that it it is not worth breaking the C-API for all existing modules.
Instead, I think that it can be done as an addition: only modules that don't use things like these static types would be allowed in subinterpreters that have their own GIL.