- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message368486
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | jaraco |
|---|---|
| Recipients | jaraco, lemburg, tucked |
| Date | 2020-05-08.23:34:27 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1588980868.53.0.937716753108.issue40570@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
It was intentional to address issue35967, although it was meant to remain compatible. Is len(uname()) an important behavior to retain? It feels like an implementation detail to me. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2020-05-08 23:34:28 | jaraco | set | recipients: + jaraco, lemburg, tucked |
| 2020-05-08 23:34:28 | jaraco | set | messageid: <1588980868.53.0.937716753108.issue40570@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020-05-08 23:34:28 | jaraco | link | issue40570 messages |
| 2020-05-08 23:34:27 | jaraco | create | |

