- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message366573
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | carljm |
|---|---|
| Recipients | carljm, corona10, dino.viehland, eelizondo, gregory.p.smith, nascheme, pablogsal, pitrou, shihai1991, steve.dower, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date | 2020-04-16.01:30:06 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1587000606.7.0.728513210102.issue40255@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Makes sense. Yes, caution is required about what code runs before fork, but forkserver’s solution for that would be a non-starter for us, since it would ensure that we can share no basically no memory at all between worker processes. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2020-04-16 01:30:06 | carljm | set | recipients: + carljm, tim.peters, nascheme, gregory.p.smith, pitrou, vstinner, dino.viehland, steve.dower, corona10, pablogsal, eelizondo, shihai1991 |
| 2020-04-16 01:30:06 | carljm | set | messageid: <1587000606.7.0.728513210102.issue40255@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2020-04-16 01:30:06 | carljm | link | issue40255 messages |
| 2020-04-16 01:30:06 | carljm | create | |

