- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message336646
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | coldfix, kernc, ncoghlan, nedbat, nikratio, xtreak |
| Date | 2019-02-26.11:15:29 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1551179729.55.0.402050149406.issue34624@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
I think the only reason I didn't mention this discrepancy in my doc updates is because I wasn't aware there *was* a discrepancy. The weird syntax was then just an incorrect amalgamation of "optional argument" notation with an improperly escaped regex suffix. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2019-02-26 11:15:29 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, nedbat, nikratio, kernc, xtreak, coldfix |
| 2019-02-26 11:15:29 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1551179729.55.0.402050149406.issue34624@roundup.psfhosted.org> |
| 2019-02-26 11:15:29 | ncoghlan | link | issue34624 messages |
| 2019-02-26 11:15:29 | ncoghlan | create | |

