- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message277184
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | Jim.Jewett |
|---|---|
| Recipients | Denny Weinberg, Jim.Jewett, Roman.Evstifeev, ammar2, belopolsky, christian.heimes, josh.r, ncoghlan, palm.kevin |
| Date | 2016-09-21.21:29:42 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1474493382.64.0.340842765206.issue27400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Having to (re-)fill the cache once per interpreter seems like a reasonable price to pay. Why is 3.5 not included? Did this not cause problems before the import change, or is it just that this bug is small enough that maybe it isn't worth backporting? |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-09-21 21:29:42 | Jim.Jewett | set | recipients: + Jim.Jewett, ncoghlan, belopolsky, christian.heimes, palm.kevin, Roman.Evstifeev, josh.r, Denny Weinberg, ammar2 |
| 2016-09-21 21:29:42 | Jim.Jewett | set | messageid: <1474493382.64.0.340842765206.issue27400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-09-21 21:29:42 | Jim.Jewett | link | issue27400 messages |
| 2016-09-21 21:29:42 | Jim.Jewett | create | |

