- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message268011
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | StyXman |
|---|---|
| Recipients | StyXman, christian.heimes, martin.panter, neologix, vstinner |
| Date | 2016-06-09.09:46:17 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1465465577.98.0.751398431234.issue26826@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Fixed the last comments, including comparing what was written to the original data, but only to the length of what was actually written. I'm just not sure if the way to handle the syscall not existing is ok. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-06-09 09:46:18 | StyXman | set | recipients: + StyXman, vstinner, christian.heimes, neologix, martin.panter |
| 2016-06-09 09:46:17 | StyXman | set | messageid: <1465465577.98.0.751398431234.issue26826@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-06-09 09:46:17 | StyXman | link | issue26826 messages |
| 2016-06-09 09:46:17 | StyXman | create | |

