- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message259064
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | vstinner |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brett.cannon, ncoghlan, vstinner, yselivanov |
| Date | 2016-01-27.21:36:24 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1453930584.97.0.522400430388.issue26219@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
If I understand correctly, this change requires to wait until the PEP 509 is accepted, right? Well, I'm not really suprised, since global cache is mentioned as an use case of the PEP 509, and other global cache patches are mentioned in Prior Art. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2016-01-27 21:36:25 | vstinner | set | recipients: + vstinner, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, yselivanov |
| 2016-01-27 21:36:24 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1453930584.97.0.522400430388.issue26219@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2016-01-27 21:36:24 | vstinner | link | issue26219 messages |
| 2016-01-27 21:36:24 | vstinner | create | |

