п'ятниця, 20-бер-2015 12:36:25 ви написали:
> Martin Panter added the comment:
> 
> There were a couple mistakes I found; see Reitveld. I was going to say to
> leave the open(mode="r") parameter as it is, since an explicit "r" is more
> readable, but since you already took some out, I’m not going to complain.
> 
> While many of the changes look worthwhile, I do worry that some of them will
> never be tested (at least until say Python 3.14 or something). E.g. I just
> tried running Tools/scripts/dutree.py cos it looked interesting, but was
> confronted with the “unorderable types: int() < NoneType()” Python 2-ism.
> 
> ----------
> 
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue22831>
> _______________________________________