- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message209075
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | barry, brett.cannon, gvanrossum, larry, meador.inge, ncoghlan, skrah, tim.peters, yselivanov, zach.ware |
| Date | 2014-01-24.14:00:30 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1390572030.41.0.208993953632.issue20189@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
There are probably still ways to do it, but we don't *support* doing it (and I'm pretty sure we've fixed them all in the builtins and stdlib). However, yes, that's another good reason to be conservative in only doing the split into signature+doc at attribute lookup time. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2014-01-24 14:00:30 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, gvanrossum, tim.peters, barry, brett.cannon, larry, skrah, meador.inge, zach.ware, yselivanov |
| 2014-01-24 14:00:30 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1390572030.41.0.208993953632.issue20189@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2014-01-24 14:00:30 | ncoghlan | link | issue20189 messages |
| 2014-01-24 14:00:30 | ncoghlan | create | |

