- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message207036
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | christian.heimes, giampaolo.rodola, janssen, pitrou, vajrasky |
| Date | 2013-12-28.16:13:59 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1388247239.25.0.225782033694.issue19422@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
Actually, it seems the patch is flawed: >>> sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_DGRAM) >>> sock.type 2 >>> sock.settimeout(0) >>> sock.type 2050 But getsockopt() returns the expected value: >>> sock.getsockopt(socket.SOL_SOCKET, socket.SO_TYPE) 2 |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-12-28 16:13:59 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, janssen, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, vajrasky |
| 2013-12-28 16:13:59 | pitrou | set | messageid: <1388247239.25.0.225782033694.issue19422@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-12-28 16:13:59 | pitrou | link | issue19422 messages |
| 2013-12-28 16:13:59 | pitrou | create | |

