- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message206992
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | serhiy.storchaka |
|---|---|
| Recipients | gennad, larry, meador.inge, serhiy.storchaka, vajrasky, zach.ware |
| Date | 2013-12-27.13:05:45 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <2285809.yi6YseUnXv@raxxla> |
| In-reply-to | <1388140500.98.0.21728038592.issue20075@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> The best fix would be to convert the docstrings to something inspect can > parse. Preferably by converting the functions to use Argument Clinic, > though you could manually mark up the docstring by hand if necessary. We can't check all docstrings in the stdlib and in all third-party libraries. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-12-27 13:05:45 | serhiy.storchaka | set | recipients: + serhiy.storchaka, larry, meador.inge, gennad, zach.ware, vajrasky |
| 2013-12-27 13:05:45 | serhiy.storchaka | link | issue20075 messages |
| 2013-12-27 13:05:45 | serhiy.storchaka | create | |

