- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message194598
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | pitrou |
|---|---|
| Recipients | brett.cannon, eric.snow, loewis, ncoghlan, pitrou, sbt |
| Date | 2013-08-07.08:02:30 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1301002546.47906547.1375862544095.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> |
| In-reply-to | <1375840196.98.0.117433808484.issue18674@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> It seems to me that the more appropriate change here would be to > redefine PyState_FindModule as return a *new* ref rather than a > borrowed ref and have it do the Py_INCREF before returning. > > Code using it would then need to add an appropriate Py_DECREF. A > reference leak is generally a less dangerous bug than an early free. I hadn't thought about that. Code must add Py_DECREF only on 3.4+, then. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-08-07 08:02:30 | pitrou | set | recipients: + pitrou, loewis, brett.cannon, ncoghlan, sbt, eric.snow |
| 2013-08-07 08:02:30 | pitrou | link | issue18674 messages |
| 2013-08-07 08:02:30 | pitrou | create | |

