> Charles-François's point about the algorithmic complexity is 
> legitimate, so I think he was actually waiting for you to amend
> your patch ;)

This doesn't seems to be the actual issue as it would require a big change for something that wasn't proven important... The old behavior is still O(1) in the new implementation. 

I might change that, but can someone give me an actual idea to implement that? Also, this can be done on another patch.


** The real problem **

I pointed out one issue about which conditions should be considered when waking up and there was no answer: http://bugs.python.org/msg190556

Also, Richard Oudkerk wrote he was expecting "wait_for_any() return a list": http://bugs.python.org/msg190597

I need to get feedback about the first one to change the second one.