- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message193333
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | ncoghlan |
|---|---|
| Recipients | adaptivelogic, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pitrou |
| Date | 2013-07-18.23:06:15 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <CADiSq7c7-jx=-sWuENnZRc4t6qV1Vke-J_c0N_TRhKxJWOA0wA@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <594652886.4271641.1374155117213.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
For dis, we introduced a new rich bytecode introspection API. Ditto for inspect.Signature. I think it makes sense to treat this as a completely new traceback introspection API and ignore the low level details of the legacy API. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-07-18 23:06:16 | ncoghlan | set | recipients: + ncoghlan, gvanrossum, pitrou, adaptivelogic |
| 2013-07-18 23:06:16 | ncoghlan | link | issue17911 messages |
| 2013-07-18 23:06:16 | ncoghlan | create | |

