- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message183968
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | sbt |
|---|---|
| Recipients | asvetlov, barry, bdkearns, brett.cannon, ezio.melotti, jcea, ncoghlan, pitrou, pjenvey, rhettinger, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, terry.reedy, zzzeek |
| Date | 2013-03-11.15:48:23 |
| SpamBayes Score | -1.0 |
| Marked as misclassified | Yes |
| Message-id | <1363016903.2.0.615126453893.issue16389@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| In-reply-to |
| Content | |
|---|---|
> Which does give me a thought - perhaps lru_cache in 3.4 could accept a > "key" argument that is called as "key(*args, **kwds)" to derive the cache > key? (that would be a separate issue, of course) Agreed. I suggested the same in an earlier post. |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2013-03-11 15:48:23 | sbt | set | recipients: + sbt, barry, brett.cannon, rhettinger, terry.reedy, jcea, ncoghlan, pitrou, pjenvey, ezio.melotti, zzzeek, asvetlov, serhiy.storchaka, bdkearns |
| 2013-03-11 15:48:23 | sbt | set | messageid: <1363016903.2.0.615126453893.issue16389@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
| 2013-03-11 15:48:23 | sbt | link | issue16389 messages |
| 2013-03-11 15:48:23 | sbt | create | |

