- Python Home
- About
- News
- Documentation
- Downloads
- Community
- Foundation
- Developer's Guide
- Issue Tracker
- Issues
- Summaries
- User
- Administration
- Help
Message109149
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
| Author | belopolsky |
|---|---|
| Recipients | amaury.forgeotdarc, belopolsky, brett.cannon, brian.curtin, daniel.urban, lemburg, mark.dickinson, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, techtonik, tim.peters, vstinner |
| Date | 2010-07-02.23:09:22 |
| SpamBayes Score | 0.0011554373 |
| Marked as misclassified | No |
| Message-id | <AANLkTinhYGpxQv2rhjTJmlahR0jXvqKOzBRuaNMa3Hfg@mail.gmail.com> |
| In-reply-to | <4C2E6DAD.1010004@egenix.com> |
| Content | |
|---|---|
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 6:52 PM, Marc-Andre Lemburg <report@bugs.python.org> wrote: .. > That said, I don't think redesigning the datetime module is part > of this ticket, just adding a second implementation of what we > already have in CPython :-) I agree. I am just looking for an excuse not to change attributes like __year to _year. :-) |
|
| History | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Date | User | Action | Args |
| 2010-07-02 23:09:24 | belopolsky | set | recipients: + belopolsky, lemburg, tim.peters, brett.cannon, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, mark.dickinson, pitrou, vstinner, techtonik, r.david.murray, brian.curtin, daniel.urban |
| 2010-07-02 23:09:22 | belopolsky | link | issue7989 messages |
| 2010-07-02 23:09:22 | belopolsky | create | |

