➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2008-12-05 20:55 by doko, last changed 2022-04-11 14:56 by admin. This issue is now closed.
| Messages (8) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg77067 - (view) | Author: Matthias Klose (doko) *  |
Date: 2008-12-05 20:55 | |
Doc/tools/sphinxext not included in the 2.6.1 tarball, but it is checked in. |
|||
| msg77068 - (view) | Author: Christian Heimes (christian.heimes) * |
Date: 2008-12-05 20:59 | |
Does it also affect Python 3.0? |
|||
| msg77070 - (view) | Author: Barry A. Warsaw (barry) * |
Date: 2008-12-05 21:17 | |
Wait, should Doc/tools/sphinxext be included in the source tarball or not? I thought it was a documentation build artifact. If so, then we need to clean out the pycs it contains in a different way. In any case, the 3.0 tarballs should include sphinxext for better or worse, because this directory is removed by the release.py script. However, the removal of it was not added to release.py until after the 3.0 tarballs were made (the 2.6.1 tarballs do not include sphinxext). Tell me which it should be and I'll fix release.py |
|||
| msg77072 - (view) | Author: Christian Heimes (christian.heimes) * |
Date: 2008-12-05 21:20 | |
In my opinion the tar balls should contain all necessary bits and pieces to build the docs yourself. It makes no sense to include the Doc/ folder w/o any means to use them. Let's include sphinxext and document the required versions of sphinx, docutils and jinja. |
|||
| msg77087 - (view) | Author: Martin v. Löwis (loewis) * |
Date: 2008-12-06 00:06 | |
This is a duplicate of issue 4551 I do *not* think that Doc/tools should include a complete sphinx checkout; doing "make checkout" is completely acceptable for anybody who wants to build the doc. However, sphinxext is different; this was fixed in r67599 |
|||
| msg77291 - (view) | Author: Matthias Klose (doko) * |
Date: 2008-12-08 07:30 | |
> In my opinion the tar balls should contain all necessary bits and pieces > to build the docs yourself. It makes no sense to include the Doc/ folder > w/o any means to use them. + 1 > Let's include sphinxext and document the required versions of sphinx, > docutils and jinja. - 1, we didn't include latex in 2.5 as well. sphinxext isn't included in sphinx, so it should be included in the release tarball. |
|||
| msg77295 - (view) | Author: Christian Heimes (christian.heimes) * |
Date: 2008-12-08 10:36 | |
I don't want to *include* sphinx, jinja and docutils but *document* which versions of sphinx, jinja and docutils are required to build the docs. |
|||
| msg77333 - (view) | Author: Georg Brandl (georg.brandl) * |
Date: 2008-12-08 18:04 | |
Well, those which "make checkout" checks out :) I set this up so that nobody needs to care about any additional packages or dependencies, as long as svn is installed and working. |
|||