➜
This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub,
and is currently read-only.
For more information,
see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.
Created on 2011-03-13 21:32 by ronaldoussoren, last changed 2022-04-11 14:57 by admin.
| Files | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| File name | Uploaded | Description | Edit | |
| issue11486.patch | ronaldoussoren, 2011-05-17 15:56 | review | ||
| Messages (4) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| msg130765 - (view) | Author: Ronald Oussoren (ronaldoussoren) *  |
Date: 2011-03-13 21:32 | |
It would be nice if it were possible to install a framework installation from source without also installing files into /Applications. This could be done by adding an option to configure --without-macosx-applications. The primairy usecase for this is development: I have a rather large set of Python frameworks on my machine with different build options and all of those install a copy of of IDLE and other application bundles into /Applications. |
|||
| msg136167 - (view) | Author: Ronald Oussoren (ronaldoussoren) * |
Date: 2011-05-17 15:56 | |
This patch adds an flag to the configure script: --without-framework-applications. When this flag is used 'make install' will not create /Applications/Python 3.3, and won't install IDLE.app and PythonLauncher.app |
|||
| msg167027 - (view) | Author: Ned Deily (ned.deily) * |
Date: 2012-07-31 18:43 | |
That would be nice although if you use your documented trick in Mac/README: ./configure --enable-framework=/Users/ronald/Library/Frameworks everything including the Applications directory is installed relative to the frameworks directory, so, in this case, /Users/ronald/Applications. It seems to work really well. |
|||
| msg394265 - (view) | Author: Erlend E. Aasland (erlendaasland) *  |
Date: 2021-05-24 19:40 | |
Ronald, do you still wish to apply this? It should be easy to rebase this patch onto main. If not, we should perhaps close this issue. |
|||